Elitist? Is this the best you've got? Bring it on

I love this. First Obama wasn't Muslim, "as far as we know". Then he's under the spell of a rabid fire-breathing Evangelical preacher. First he wasn't black enough. Then he was playing the race card, and a closet separatist. Then he was lying about his resume: he wasn't a law professor. Now he's too 'elitist'.

What's next? First he was too Reaganite. Now he's too liberal.

Obama defies every attempt to 'frame' him in the classic conservative triangulating manner of the 90s. Why? Because he's a change candidate. He doesn't fit in the box. And every attempt to pigeon hole him just proves the opposite.

So bring it on MYDD.

Let's have more diaries about how he's an elitist, because like the Wright issue, every accusation just gives Obama a chance to get more air time and punch back. And if Hillary and McCain, the epitome of privileged Washington insiders, keep on playing this one - then I look forward to Obama bringing it on, and showing who the real elitists are

"Out of touch?  Out of touch?  I mean, John McCain--it took him three tries to finally figure out that the home foreclosure crisis was a problem and to come up with a plan for it, and he's saying I'm out of touch?  Senator Clinton voted for a credit card-sponsored bankruptcy bill that made it harder for people to get out of debt after taking money from the financial services companies, and she says I'm out of touch?  No, I'm in touch.  I know exactly what's going on. I know what's going on in Pennsylvania. I know what's going on in Indiana. I know what's going on in Illinois.  People are fed-up. They're angry and they're frustrated and they're bitter. And they want to see a change in Washington and that's why I'm running for President of the United States of America."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc9PepjyD ow&eurl


Poll
Will the charge that Obama's elitist
Is the misstep Hillary's been waiting for
A nail in the coffin of his candidacy
A blip in the blogosphere
Offend lots of Democrats
Offend only Republicans
Backfire on the accusers

Votes: 27
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? Bring it (2.00 / 1)

The answer to your question is "Backfire on the accusers."

The MSM is already smacking them down. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4G8dRMofH Ns


by vermontprog on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:27:05 AM EST

The slur actually helps (2.00 / 1)

Yes, in some ways I think this could play to Obama's favour. Describing him as elitist allows him to do a double whammy - use his biography as the son of one parent family AND tackle the elitist beltway crowd, which includes McCain and Hillary.

Bring it on. More crazy contradictory accusations please. Obama just laps them up


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:30:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Thinking about it with calm as you say... (2.00 / 2)

And I see your mind is boggling!

Are you really trying to tell me that Obama, with his roots in lower middle class reality, his years working as a community activist, his use of small donors to finance his campaign, his constant championing of the underdog and celebration of collective collaboration in his campaign is some how...

MORE ELITIST THAN HILLARY?
HAS MORE CONTEMPT FOR THE MIDDLE CLASSES THAN MCCAIN

Boggle, boggle, boggle.


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:51:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thinking about it with calm as you say... (2.00 / 1)

And what are the alternatives? The Keating Five and a Democrat who has numerous conflict of interest problems within her staff and her family, and a pro-war vote for the worst quagmire the US has been in in 40 years.

Its no contest.


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:51:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thinking about it with calm as you say... (2.00 / 1)

So now you're claiming someone's actions as a community organizer are completely disingenuous. Based on what? A gut feeling? That seems to be rampant in lieu of reason.

Clinton has her own set of problems - and she is the one running, not Bill, the former President. We're not voting for him.

And please share with me what kind of "elitist" language I used - I'm looking forward to being classified as elitist after a medical bankruptcy and living paycheck to paycheck as my parents did.


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 12:04:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Bring it on (2.00 / 0)

I've become so tired of social and personal issues consuming economic, evironmental, foreign policy, issues in our last campaigns.  It seems that they are always tossed out there to make sure we focus on what divides, and not unifies, us.  His speech was a relief to me.  It pulls the focus to what the government can do and needs to do, rather than adding fuel to the "he's like me no he's not" junk.  


by mady on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:41:02 AM EST

The sound of a worrier... (none / 0)

Touched a nerve, I see.  Well, don't get your knickers in a twist, limey.  I'm sure the mainstream media will rally to his defense; particularly MSNBC. They always do.


by DaTruth on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:41:57 AM EST

Re: The sound of a worrier... (2.00 / 2)

I'm not worried. I'm delighted. Bring it on.

I love it that now the Main Stream Media is all in Obama's pocket. Blimey - as we limeys say - did you see that bit when for three weeks they kept saying Hillary has 'won' Texas?

Two signs of a candidacy about to end

1. It's all because of bias in the MSM
2. The candidate says they are not standing down


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:45:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? Bring it (2.00 / 1)

Has anyone had a Dem Candidate in your District or State that their Republican opponent did not use the word "elitist" in some manner?

The McCain response and the Clinton response could have easily been exchanged.
You know this will be brought up in the PA debate.


"If you want to end war and stuff, you gotta sing loud"...Arlo Guthrie
by nogo war on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:42:12 AM EST

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? Bring it (none / 0)

Absolutely

Let Hillary PLEASE bring it up:

And maybe she can talk about what SHE did after law school? Or perhaps her tax returns?

And then Obama can talk about NOT becoming a corporate lawyer for Walmart. And not being in the pocket of lobbyists and rich benefactors.

Please. More of this.


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:47:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? Bring it (2.00 / 1)

 Dude this is going to be all over the news for the next week and in typical BO supporter fasion you use this to attack HRC.  Did she say this.

I have a better idea how about going back to the BO meme of two months ago and start calling the Clinton's racist.  Or do you not remember the David Axelrod memo telling his staff to talk about how the clinton's statements were racially insensitive.

You always know when Bo is in deep shit when they start attacking HRC instead of taking responsibility for Bo comments.

david


by giusd on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:56:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? Bring it (2.00 / 1)

David. Once again you miss the point. I think it was Hillary who started with this attack line about Obama calling the people of Pennsylvania 'bitter'.

This is not attacking Hillary. This is called defending your candidate. And of course when people defend Obama from Hillary's attacks, they're called bullies.

You can't have it both ways. Hillary's supporters are always celebrating what a fighter she is. And it's true. And I admire her fight. But I don't admire the way that, when in a political fight, she (or her supporters) suddenly claim she's a victim.

Fighter or victim? Which is it? And is defending your candidate from an attack from the other candidate fair game?

I would have thought so.


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:03:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary who started this attack line? (none / 0)

I'm sorry, I had gotten the impression it was Obama who made a statement about bitter people with their guns and religion, etc.  Was I mistaken?


by Trickster on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 12:35:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary who started this attack line? (none / 0)

Trickster, as always you're never mistaken, as your handle suggests, there is something else going on.

Care to read the thread I responded to though, and you'll find I was merely answering the accusation that I'd unfairly attacked Hillary. I think she led the attack.

And I'm glad you appreciate the bit of jujitsu Obama did in reverse. In that transcript, it sounded a bit awkward, but in his speech yesterday it was crystal clear: bitterness at economic hardship among many middle class Americans has been effectively diverted into issues such as gay weddings, the right to bear arms, etc. so that republicans can feed anger over this issues, while stealthily passing on tax cuts to the rich, and following economic policies that devastate local industries.

As a lifelong democrat, I'm sure you agree with most of this. I look forward to your input.

Or perhaps you want to join Hillary and McCain in painting Obama as an elitist? That's going to be fun to watch - unless you can add mental contortionism to your repertoire  


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 12:44:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (2.00 / 1)

Funny this is a democratic page do you have a link to someone here suggusting that BO is a  Muslim???

Who on this page suggested that BO is not Black enough?  HRC??? Her campaign.  Are you suggesting anyone in her campaign is doing this???

We never said he wasnt a law professor we said he was not a Professor of Constitutional law and he should stop going around saying that.

This is a classic strawman.  First you make statements that are incorrect and you chose to state because it supports your argument even through they were not made by this page but were made by right wingers.  Then after incorrectly accusing this page of these attack you go on to make some argument about people on this page are BAD for making statement that they never made.

This is called strawman.

And one last thing. BO is a child of privilege and he lived with family that were the oppposite of poor.  Mind you this is not an attack no one has to defend how they were raised and how much money their family had.  But come on he went to best and most prestigious private schools for high school, college, and graduate school.

I guess those working class voters who send their childern to public schools funded by a properaty taxes might think he is "you know" kind of an elitist.  Just saying.

david


by giusd on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:51:17 AM EST

Re: Elitist (2.00 / 0)

-Funny this is a democratic page do you have a link to someone here suggusting that BO is a  Muslim???

Who on this page suggested that BO is not Black enough?  HRC??? Her campaign.  Are you suggesting anyone in her campaign is doing this???-

So quick to victimization. The diarist didn't say any such thing and you know it. And you're so quick to bring up strawmen right after you use one!

And are you seriously comparing Obama getting into Harvard on the strength of his grades with being worth a fraction of what either of the two candidates are currently worth?


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:56:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

Did i say this?

"And are you seriously comparing Obama getting into Harvard on the strength of his grades with being worth a fraction of what either of the two candidates are currently worth?"  

No this is a strawman.  First i suggest something i have never said.

What i said was this "And one last thing. BO is a child of privilege and he lived with family that were the oppposite of poor."

So again you have twisted my words.  

Finally, this is the first sentence of the thread "I love this. First Obama wasn't Muslim" so i think i link should be provided.

david


by giusd on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:03:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (2.00 / 1)

David. Here's the link. I'm surprised you missed this moment, but I take it on good faith you will retract that strawman argument now.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/03 /hillary-obama-not-muslim_n_89546.html


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:09:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

take it on good faith you will retract that strawman argument now.

See below.  I take it on faith that you will correct the record that you omitted a critical part of HRC statement to make you argument. That my friend is one aspect of a strawman argument.  Unless you suggest that HRC did not say this,

"You don't believe that Senator Obama's a Muslim?" Kroft asked Sen. Clinton.

1.  "Of course not.

2   I mean, that, you know, there is no basis for that.

3.   I take him on the basis of what he says.

4.   And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that," she replied.

I guess you forgot to mention this in you post.  I am sure this was just and oversight.

david


by giusd on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:25:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (2.00 / 0)

Here's your link, David. Please try to be more prepared next time on current events.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/02 /clinton-as-far-as-i-kno_n_89488.html


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:10:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

And here is what HRC said and i guess you forgot to write this.

"You don't believe that Senator Obama's a Muslim?" Kroft asked Sen. Clinton.

"Of course not. I mean, that, you know, there is no basis for that. I take him on the basis of what he says. And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that," she replied."

And upstate girl please be more prepared to defend your statements.  What it looks like is someone forgot to post this part of HRC statement. Is there any way these words from HRC can be parsed to mean anything other than what they say.  

1.  "Of course not.

2   I mean, that, you know, there is no basis for that.

3.   I take him on the basis of what he says.

4.   And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that," she replied.

Please stop your condensending tude with me.  You post is not rigerously presented.  Your own link undercuts your argument.

You should be ashamed of your self for you comment to me that undercuts your own statements.

david


by giusd on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:20:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (2.00 / 0)

As far as parsing goes, you've already tried to insinuate that someone at MyDD said those words about Obama, and when presented with proof that yes, those words came out of her mouth, you continue to parse them more. Unfortunate slip? Probably, and not worth the big deal you're making out of it - especially when its not even the subject of the diary.


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:30:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

Again HRC never said this.  This is untrue.  i have posted what she said and aftet that it seems hard to understand how anyone could suggest that HRC was suggesting BO was a muslin.

daivd


by giusd on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:32:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (2.00 / 0)

You flipped your wig when you read the first sentence of this diary, and demanded to know where on MyDD someone said that Obama wasn't a Muslim, as far as they knew. And lo and behold:

""You said you'd take Senator Obama at his word that he's not...a Muslim. You don't believe that he's...," Kroft said.

"No. No, there is nothing to base that on. As far as I know," she said."

Did she say it? Yep.


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:35:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

David.

I think it was Hillary who equivocated on this. She said Obama wasn't a Muslim, as far as she knew. No strawman. Everyone got the lack of a resounding 'NO he isn't.'

As for you concept that Obama was the child of a privileged family: have you read his autobiography? Obviously not. There is some money on his mother's side, way up the line, but his father was Kenyan and abandoned him to a one parent family. His Kenyan relatives live in very modest circumstances.

OK. He got into Harvard and excelled there (is this because he was rich, no - because he was bright) but then what did he do? Rather than go to Wall Street, or like Hillary, work for Walmart, he got lowly paid jobs as a community organiser in Chicago.

Yes, when he became a state senator, he was in an Elite. When he became a US senator, even more of an elite. He earned four million dollars over four years, mainly due to his book. That's pretty high earnings.

But compare this to Hillary. We're talking a magnitude of hundreds of millions of dollars by comparison.

So don't give me the 'privilege' story. All politicians become relatively privileged.

But of the three candidates still running for presidency, you'd have to be willingly blind or stupidly partisan to follow this line of attack against Obama. It sticks much better to Hillary or McCain

Just sayin


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:57:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

First off i have a very good memory.  This is not what she said.

"I think it was Hillary who equivocated on this. She said Obama wasn't a Muslim, as far as she knew."  You very conviently omited what she said before this which was when she said "of course not".  Funny how you forgot to post that. I am sure that was just an oversight by your part.

And funny how comfortable you feel parsing HRC words so as they fit what you want them to say.  Are you suggesting that "as far as i know" means anything more than that.  This is typical of what BO and his campaign do.  They parse every word from HRC to say not what HRC said but what they want her to say.

And since you bring this up his wife made almost 400k at the University of Chicago Hospitals.  Doing outreach.  Almost 400k.  Do you know that is almost 3x want an asst prof in medicine makes.  So give me a break.  I think people who work hard and make good money is cool and deserved.  But please i know what it is like to come from a working class family when you have to go to city college because your family cant pay for private school.  So when we hear someone go on about how working class voters are bitter you might think about how upset that makes some people.

david


by giusd on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:14:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

David. Let's not start trading ad hominems. You have no idea how tough my background was either. But if we're making judgements on candidates because of their experience of poverty, Obama would win hands down on every count.

Yes, the 'bitter' phrase did sound a bit odd in that transcript. But the explanation yesterday make it crystal clear. He's talking about how anger at the economy hasn't found a proper political expression in the last decade or more, and that working class votes will be diverted into issues like gun licenses, gay weddings etc by cynical republicans who then offer tax cuts to the rich.

As a democrat, I would have thought you would agree with this diagnosis.

Of course, unless you're just more interested in any angle of attack which will undermine the leading candidate, in which case, you'll join McCain in trying to make a big deal about Obama being elitist.

Don't expect too much success on that one though


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:20:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

I never made a comment on what you or anyones elses backgound is other that BO.  

Well we can just agree to disagree on what BO said and leave it at that.

david


by giusd on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:27:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (2.00 / 0)

Those words are exactly what she said. She said more, but she said those words. You're one to be parsing for meaning after twisting Obama's words out of joint so far they scream.

I'm sorry if you don't think the Obama's are currently poor enough for you to understand what its like to struggle, and therefore that discounts whatever they say about the subject entirely. By any honest intellectual standard, you would judge the other two candidates even more harshly.


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:22:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

Again you are parsing my words.

I never said.

1. Obama's are currently poor enough for you to understand what its like to struggle.

2. I discount whatever they say about the subject entirely.

3. how i judge other candidates.

and finally we can agree to disagee about what i think BO words mean.  It seems very clear to me but people can disagree.

david


by giusd on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:30:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (2.00 / 0)

Oh, we're certainly going to disagree, but its pretty telling that you had to go through numerous arguments that didn't have anything to do with what he said at all before you could finally lay it to rest as a "difference of opinion". Its pretty clear what your opinion is being colored by, and its not facts.


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:53:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist (none / 0)

Funny this is a democratic page do you have a link to someone here suggusting that BO is a  Muslim???

TexasDarlin posted some filth that included two or three variations on the Obama-is-a-muslim thing. And that wasn't even the most despicable thing in it. She deleted it after it was pointed out to her how ignorant, racist and hateful it was. Surprising someone had to point that out to her, but I guess she didn't want to get banned again.

And one last thing. BO is a child of privilege and he lived with family that were the oppposite of poor.

Yeah, his millionaire single mother and superwealthy grandfather the furniture salesman?

You people just make this crap up as you go along, or did you make up some website (Crankopedia?) as a central site for your delusions, illusions and fantasies (you could call it "Tuzla.com"!)


by BlueinColorado on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 01:04:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

no, its just the tip of the iceberg (none / 0)

finally showing itself above the water.  Obama's in some trouble here...any more gaffes like that and his chances at the nomination evaporate.


by 4justice on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:52:48 AM EST

Re: no, its just the tip of the iceberg (2.00 / 1)

Actually, I'm happy this happened because it showed exactly how Obama will not be swiftboated by lies and distortions attributed to him. I'm proud he stood up and didn't apologize for telling the truth.


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:57:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: no, its just the tip of the iceberg (2.00 / 2)

I love the smell of wish fulfilment in the morning.

Don't hold your breath waiting for his candidacy to evaporate. You'll expire


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:59:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? Bring it (2.00 / 3)

Obama said the truth. He just didn't phrase it correctly.
HRc and McCain are on the wrong path when they call Obama 'elitist' when he was raised by a single mom and raised him by his hand.

McCain is worth $110m- which he married into and comes from a family of Admirals. HRC made $109m and plays the 'victim'.
They are the elitists.


A former hillary supporter.
by Cristalgirl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:03:37 AM EST

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? Bring it (2.00 / 2)

The good thing about this is it shows the SDs one more time how he swiftly counters attacks on him, as he (or HRC) will undoubtedly have to do many times during the GE. He even tends to turn it in his favor. There is no use looking for a candidate that the Repubs won't be able to attack - they will attack any we nominate. What the SDs are looking at is how they flick it aside and go on. As opposed to Bosnia which doesn't go away because her own husband brings it up again (and explains that it was because she's 60 and it was late). LOL. How can that not concern SDs when they see her campaign is so undisciplined.


by Becky G on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:08:46 AM EST

Blip in the blogosphere. (2.00 / 1)

Americans forget things pretty quickly. As soon as the MSM gets over it, people will stop thinking about it. People on blogs are the ones who keep score on everything -- just so we can have more ammo to use every time a candidate does something questionable. How many diaries have there been on this so far? We need a better scandal because this is boring the hell out of me.
Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:36:01 AM EST

Re: Blip in the blogosphere. (2.00 / 2)

Sricki. You're a gem. And always the first to come up with an 'out of the box' remark.

:-)

I agree. The scandals are getting really tired these days. Professor with a p or not. Bittergate. Bill talking agains about Tuzla.

The 80s and 90s were much better for scandals. If only one of the candidates would hire a call girl, or scream during a debate or something fun. Especially if it's McCain!!


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:44:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Blip in the blogosphere. (2.00 / 1)

LOL, I wish we could find out McCain had some interesting fetishes, or something -- a creepy foot fetish might be good. That'd be entertaining. Or maybe we could find out that Mark Penn enjoys toe-sucking? Oh wait... that's an old, tired one now, too. Damn Dick Morris. He ruins everything.
Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:57:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

As always... (2.00 / 2)

...I think Brits led the way on toe-sucking. Fergie taught Dick Morris everything he knows on that score.

Don't you just wish you had a hereditary head of state though like in our little medieval Kingdom. No primaries to suffer, you'd just get the son of the previous head or state, or the wife...

Ooops. In the new MYDD spirit of friendliness I take that last remark back

:-)


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 12:10:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: As always... (none / 0)

Heh, I know the dynasty thing freaks a lot of people out. It's odd, I suppose, but I think Hillary would make a much better president than Bill -- otherwise I wouldn't be voting for her.

I like the new spirit of friendliness, though I don't think it's progressed very far yet. That's obvious just from looking at the rec list. Of course, it's natural that it should be worse today with bittergate in full force. And there are a few people around here I just can't be nice to, so I've decided to ignore them as much as possible.

Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 04:20:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: As always... (none / 0)

I know the feeling. I assume you get hateful stuff from Obama supporters, which I don't get. But just look at this thread.

I've had Trickster telling me to  f*koff ***hole and some other idiot keep calling me a limey and telling me I'm not wanted here.

Do you get that from Obama supporters. I hope not.

I don't mind it from those two guys though. Show's me their losing it. Squish the trolls. Whatever side they're on!


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 08:11:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: As always... (none / 0)

I saw a lot more hateful stuff from Obama supporters on DKos, but it really isn't so bad here. There's one Obama supporter who's had the comment, "Fine, you take the bitch -- I won't be voting for her in November," hidden multiple times (because he's stupid enough to have said it more than once), but I don't see that level of animosity from you guys very often on MyDD. That guy's always been especially caustic.

I don't think anyone's ever told me to f*ck off... I didn't even realize people used the term "limey" anymore. My mom's obsessed with Brits. She's weird. She always wanted to marry a man with an English accent, but there aren't many available here in the Deep South.

I keep getting the impression... I don't know, it seems like there's more immaturity (on this site) coming from Clinton supporters. Immaturity as in childishness -- not only in terms of what they say, but the way in which they say it. It reminds me of some of my friends back when I was in middle school. Again, it's not that many people, but they're very vocal. Maybe it's because Hillary's behind. Maybe it's because people realize there aren't a lot of legitimate ways left for her to win the nomination. Even when I was in "I hate Obama" mode, I never wanted the super delegates to give it to her if she didn't win the popular vote OR more delegates. I just don't think any good can come of that. I think we'd lose the GE.

Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 10:31:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: (2.00 / 1)

Blip and/or backfire.  You can tell that some people are getting desperate by the sheer number of diaries on the subject (now breeding their own counter-diaries).  


by rfahey22 on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:45:12 AM EST

Re: (2.00 / 1)

Yeah. Whatever happened to that MYDD moment of calm, when we were just supposed to positive about our candidates? I suppose it got a bit boring... :-)

But good to see there are still plenty of trolls around to squish. I was getting out of practice


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 12:07:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? Bring it (none / 0)


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 12:29:20 PM EST

Impressions Usually Have a Basis (none / 0)

If people are wondering whether Obama is too liberal or too conservative or too black or not black enough, maybe it's not because people are stupid but because Obama has been all over the goddamned place with his statements and actions, from saying his foreign policy will be like Reagan's to saying he'll meet with any foreign leaders with no pre-conditions to saying he won't meet with Hamas to publicly calling his "spiritual mentor" a prominent radical black liberation theologian to sneering at small-town voters' beliefs.

The man's past is a cipher.  He apparently re-invented himself from Barry to Barack and intentionally associated himself with TUCC and its message as a young man.  His "autobiography" was admittedly semi-fictional.  If anybody, family, friend, teacher, whomever, knows him from 20-25 years ago and has stepped forward into the public light to talk about him, I'm not aware of it.

He was liberal in the Illinois Senate, but he represented one of the most liberal areas in Illinois.  Even so, he managed to avoid plenty of controversial votes.

He has a fairly detailed web site in terms of policy positions, but a web site can be taken down the day after the election.  How often does he actually talk about those positions, as opposed to his hope/change pablum?

Who the hell is he?


by Trickster on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 12:46:51 PM EST

Re: Impressions Usually Have a Basis (2.00 / 0)

Oh, like his students, his own professors when he was in school, his grade school teachers, his co-senators (many of whom support his candidacy)?

Be honest with yourself. Its not for lack of information. Its for lack of wanting to acknowledge its there. Its makes for a much better talking point if you ignore the truth.

And Barry to Barack is the most ridiculous talking point of them all. I've had a lot of friends and family switch from "Danny" to "Daniel". My god, what are they hiding!

Please.


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 12:51:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Impressions Usually Have a Basis (none / 0)

You're so right Upstate Girl. Now I'm worried...

I named my daughter Katherine. But she prefers to be know as Katy..

OMG I'VE BEEN RAISING A CIPHER!!


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 01:08:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Impressions Usually Have a Basis (2.00 / 0)

Who is your daughter....REALLY?????

Honestly, the attempts at spinning Obama at this point as some huge unknown is so divorced from reality it would be offensive if it wasn't so pathetic.


by upstate girl on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 01:12:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Impressions Usually Have a Basis (none / 0)

Why do you have to denigrate me by referring to what I say as "talking points?"  I'm a fucking human being trying to figure some things out, not a wind-up robot or a paid shill.

All I can tell you is that I read the 15-20 best political news sources nearly every day--probably 350 out of the last 365--and I've been curious about Obama's background, and I haven't seen a single person who claims to have been Obama's close friend or family member that long ago or longer who has been interviewed in the press.  And I've been looking for it.

This is an obscure person, not very well known before the last few years, and his campaign has very obviously not made a point out of illuminating the details of his biography (compare Bill Clinton, who similarly burst on the scene in '92 but whose campaign very much emphasized his biography, a man who had many old friends who had known him since childhood and who talked to the press about him: "The Man From Hope").  Further, he has indeed been all over the political spectrum with his campaign remarks.  I truly don't know where he's coming from, and I have been trying pretty hard to find out.


by Trickster on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 01:58:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Impressions Usually Have a Basis (none / 0)

Nice framing attempt. The fact Obama is a change candidate, and breaks many of tired (and frankly failed) shibboleths of the last 20 years you call: "all over the place". Nice try. But it won't wash...

Why? Because as you've seen with the Wright affair, the more chance Obama has to articulate his positions, the more people like them. The contradictions you've searched hard to find - many of them tendentious (e.g. Hamas do not represent a state) - are part of this complexity. Some of them are less worked out. But the more the campaign focuses on them, the clearer his thinking becomes.

Now you're back with cipher. It was the initial Penn framing device, and then used again Hillary's 'anti hope' speech, and I must say it's dumb to use this line at this stage of the primaries when his background and policy positions have been subject to three months of intense media scrutiny.

Cipher? Compare how much we know about Obama compared to virtually every other dem candidate at this point in the election cycle (just start with Carter) and you'll see how ridiculous that argument is. You may not like his policies, or prefer someone more right/left partisan, or someone whose biography has ghost written, but don't try pretend we don't know who Obama is in an unprecedented way compared to most elections.

I don't think you believe it for a moment. This is just an attempt at concern hijacking. I think your problem is that the more people get to know Obama, in every state, the higher he climbs


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 01:01:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

That's a very insulting response (none / 0)

"Nice framing attempt."  
"Nice try." "as you've seen" [have i]
"contradictions you've searched hard to find"
"many of them tendentious (e.g. Hamas do not represent a state)" [yeah this 5 minutes]
"Now you're back with cipher."
"it's dumb to use this line"
"you'll see how ridiculous that argument is"
"don't try pretend we don't know who Obama is"
"I don't think you believe it for a moment."
"This is just an attempt at concern hijacking."
"I think your problem is . . ."

Well fuck you too, asshole.  Do you really think I want to get into a conversation with someone who treats me like that?  Why on earth when there's a world full of nice people should I want to talk to one who assumes everything I say is some kind of calculated lie?

If anybody really wants to talk about this issue, I'm here.


by Trickster on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 02:04:57 PM EST

Re: That's a very insulting response (none / 0)

Wow. You can't take what you dish out. You called Obama a cipher. I called you on assertion. And your reasoned argument back is

"Fuck you asshole"

If you're the same Trickster who posts on Open Left, I wonder what's happened to you. You used to have arguments. I disagreed with them but we could debate. Now, instead of arguments, you just have emotional issues.

Don't pretend you're being reasonable when you're not


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 07:10:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That's a very insulting response (none / 0)

I called Obama a cipher.

You called me a liar, about 15 different ways, each of which I listed.

My feelings are not a bit hurt, but as a political statement I choose to highlight this discussion for the edification of others, not to participate in it.


by Trickster on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 07:42:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That's a very insulting response (none / 0)

No, I called you out on the idea that over the most extended primary season in living memory that somehow he hasn't been scrutinised. That your response to that was 'fuck off' tells me that you had no argument to counter it.

You also chose to ignore the main thrust of what I said - about how economic bitterness being hijacked by republicans. But then again I'm not surprised anymoe.

As for calling you a liar, Trickster. You selected that epithet for yourself. I have no idea whether you lie or not. But if you're going to be polemical, it's best not to lose your bottle. Using
the word 'edifying' won't undo what you said.

If you're not upset, you're at least incoherent.


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 07:50:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? (none / 0)

Of course not. He's not elitist, condescending, or arrogant. To know him is to love him. And one way or another a light will come on in everybody's head that they have to vote for him.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 09:11:09 PM EST

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? (none / 0)

That joke was old last month, and didn't work for Hillary even then. Have you been away? Didn't you get the memo?


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 09:13:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? (none / 0)

Where's the joke? Those are things he's actually said...


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 09:20:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? (none / 0)

God. That's even funnier. You're talking about Obama's words? And you didn't get the joke?

He was kidding, dude. After the Hillary speech. Duh! Check out the internets. Even the most hardcore Hillary supporter doesn't use that one anymore.


by brit on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 09:26:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? (none / 0)

Show me where he was kidding.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 09:34:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? (none / 0)

No. Can't be bothered. Look it up yourself. This is such a dead horse you're flogging, it's been buried for a month.


by brit on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 08:19:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? (none / 0)

Then you're full of shit, sorry to say. I'm not going to expend one second of time looking into the validity of some troll's argument. If you can't prove anything, don't say anything.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 10:22:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? (none / 0)

Look up thread: you came up with the troll argument you jerk, so the onus on you is to prove it. But you can't.

As for bullshit: he who smelt it, dealt it.


by brit on Mon Apr 14, 2008 at 05:46:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elitist? Is this the best you've got? (none / 0)

Ooh name-calling. Now I can take you seriously...


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Mon Apr 14, 2008 at 03:03:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.